Comments on: Why the “Quack Watchers” Need to be Watched http://blog.watershed.net/2009/05/15/why-the-quack-watchers-need-to-be-watched/ We are Ionizers! Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:25:05 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: bob http://blog.watershed.net/2009/05/15/why-the-quack-watchers-need-to-be-watched/comment-page-1/#comment-1024 bob Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:06:27 +0000 http://blog.alkaline-living.com/?p=27#comment-1024 Thanks for your comments. 1. Stomach acid and IW: <a href="http://www.watershed.net/media/pdf/ionized-water-stomach-acid.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.watershed.net/media/pdf/ionized-water-stomach-acid.pdf</a> 2. Great idea. We could do things like that. They still would not be regarded as scientific studies because we are doing them ourselves. It doesn't make them less valid, but they won't be recognized the way they would be if a university or scientific institution conducted the study. Bob Thanks for your comments.

1. Stomach acid and IW: http://www.watershed.net/media/pdf/ionized-water-stomach-acid.pdf

2. Great idea. We could do things like that. They still would not be regarded as scientific studies because we are doing them ourselves. It doesn’t make them less valid, but they won’t be recognized the way they would be if a university or scientific institution conducted the study.

Bob

]]> By: Eric Johnson http://blog.watershed.net/2009/05/15/why-the-quack-watchers-need-to-be-watched/comment-page-1/#comment-1022 Eric Johnson Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:13:37 +0000 http://blog.alkaline-living.com/?p=27#comment-1022 It is nice to see an article exposing the truth about the "quack watchers" There is a great google video DYING TO HAVE KNOWN that exposes the quack watchers. They are definitely out to steer you away from the simple truths that is given free from the Divine Creator. It is nice to see an article exposing the truth about the “quack watchers”

There is a great google video DYING TO HAVE KNOWN that exposes the quack watchers. They are definitely out to steer you away from the simple truths that is given free from the Divine Creator.

]]> By: j http://blog.watershed.net/2009/05/15/why-the-quack-watchers-need-to-be-watched/comment-page-1/#comment-133 j Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:11:17 +0000 http://blog.alkaline-living.com/?p=27#comment-133 Got quite excited to see someone else sighing at the attitude at Quackbusters etc. I asked them for guidance to find me something that they believe to be true but isn't currently accepted. They ignored that. They then debunked my question about something without any involvement in the discussion. They wish to debunk everything and get a joy out of it. They stand behind science but don't want to socially engage in discussion of any sort. One said argues yes, the other side argues no, and nobody few bother considering both points of view. I'd like to be prepared for debunking so I need preparation: 1) How does the pH change get past the acidic stomach environment? 2) I'd like to say that double blind studies don't always have to be expensive. I agree on the problem of incentive. We could do our own studies. For example, try this: Get a multimeter, electrode in each hand, measure the voltage. Now do some Tai Chi. I did mine for 1 minute but I recommend doing it for 5mins really, and doing it seriously. Now remeasure your voltage. I got a 0.2volt increase. ^this experiement needs to be done double blind now so that the person tested doesn't know and the person testing doesn't know. This is cheap and possible. How shall I design my experiment? Got quite excited to see someone else sighing at the attitude at Quackbusters etc. I asked them for guidance to find me something that they believe to be true but isn’t currently accepted. They ignored that. They then debunked my question about something without any involvement in the discussion. They wish to debunk everything and get a joy out of it. They stand behind science but don’t want to socially engage in discussion of any sort. One said argues yes, the other side argues no, and nobody few bother considering both points of view.

I’d like to be prepared for debunking so I need preparation:

1) How does the pH change get past the acidic stomach environment?

2) I’d like to say that double blind studies don’t always have to be expensive. I agree on the problem of incentive. We could do our own studies. For example, try this:
Get a multimeter, electrode in each hand, measure the voltage.
Now do some Tai Chi. I did mine for 1 minute but I recommend doing it for 5mins really, and doing it seriously.
Now remeasure your voltage. I got a 0.2volt increase.

^this experiement needs to be done double blind now so that the person tested doesn’t know and the person testing doesn’t know. This is cheap and possible. How shall I design my experiment?

]]>